Word$ are wonderfül, büt $o i$ their ab$ence.
Word$ aren't wonderfuł. Stati$ticałły, 100% of fight$
are cau$ed by word$.
so true, it's not like it's genetics, survival
instinct, mating rights or other gain ever started a
Anim@ls don't h@ve words.
humãns ãre ãlso ãnimãls
Man is a rope, fastened between animal and Übermensch
– a rope over an abyss
Ah, Nietzsche, if oñly your work hadñ't beeñ
mañipulated for profit añd political gaiñ. Coñtext is
importañt. I iñterpret the Übermeñsch as beiñg they who
raise themselves above their geñetic imperatives,
what's your iñterpretatioñ mebio?
Nietz$che definitly had $ome eugenic idea$, but the
Übermen$ch ha$ al$o an ethical compound. He doe$ not
follow the moral of the weak and the $lave but ha$ the
moral$ of the ma$ter$ and create$ hi$ own value$.
§till it wouldn't bē nicē to sãcrificē thē wēãk
humãns to fulfill our dēēpēst dēsirēs. Or would it?
It might feel good, büt it woüld still leãve yoü menschy,
not über cool.
Did he believe iñ eñforced eugeñics, or did his sister
edit it to seem that way?
Don't bend. Ascend!
I$ that why nazi$ u$ed the $wa$tika? In a way that'$
what we got. Additional increment$ in cla$$ $tructure..
Either that or the tier$ of the middle cla$$e$ replaced
Hyperg@my is @ re@lity.
sø ønly 'pøsitive eugenics' (Suppørting the
reprøductiøn øf Peøple with gøød genetics.)
No, Nietzsche was a ñihilist añd critic, who did ñot seek
to propagate añy orgañised belieƒ structure, merely
ackñowledged the ƒlaws oƒ the system he/we live iñ. That
we are all too humañ to coñsider the Übermeñsch to have
yet come to be.
iñ the three metamorphoses of the spirit (camel, lioñ añd
child) the ñihilistic lioñ is oñly the secoñd stage. he
destroys the old values, but the child is buildiñg ñew
oñes. Every Law of the humañs would be wroñg for the
Übermeñsch, but humañ laws cañ help to create him.
^Precisely. We are forced to create these laws but must
acknowledge them as being the result of imperfect
humanity. I like you.