Words arē wondērfül, büt so is thēir absēncē.
Words @reñ't woñderful. St@tistic@lly, 100% of fights
@re c@used by words.
so true, it's not like it's genetics, survival
instinct, mating rights or other gain ever started a
Animals don't have words.
humans arē also animals
Man is a rope, fastened between animal and Übermensch
– a rope over an abyss
Ah, Nietzsche, if oñly your work h@dñ't beeñ
m@ñipul@ted for profit @ñd politic@l g@iñ. Coñtext is
import@ñt. I iñterpret the Übermeñsch @s beiñg they who
r@ise themselves @bove their geñetic imper@tives,
wh@t's your iñterpret@tioñ mebio?
Niētzschē dēfinitly had somē ēugēnic idēas, but thē
Übērmēnsch has also an ēthical compound. Hē doēs not
follow thē moral of thē wēak and thē slavē but has thē
morals of thē mastērs and crēatēs his own valuēs.
Still it wouldn't be nice to sacrifice the weak
humans to fulfill our deepest desires. Or would it?
It might feel good, but it would still leave you menschy,
not uber cool.
Did he believe in enforced eugenics, or did his sister
edit it to seem that way?
Don't bēnd. Ascēnd!
Is ☨ha☨ why ñazis used ☨he swas☨ika? Iñ a way ☨ha☨'s
wha☨ we go☨. Addi☨ioñal iñcremeñ☨s iñ class s☨ruc☨ure..
Ei☨her ☨ha☨ or ☨he ☨iers of ☨he middle classes replaced
Hypergamy i$ a reałi☨y.
so onl¥ 'positive eugenics' (Supporting the
reproduction of People with good genetics.)
No, Niētzschē was a nihilist and critic, who did not sēēk
to propagatē any organisēd bēliēf structurē, mērēly
acknowlēdgēd thē flaws of thē systēm hē/wē livē in. That
wē arē all too human to considēr thē Übērmēnsch to havē
yēt comē to bē.
in the three metamorphoses of the spirit (camel, lion and
child) the nihilistic lion is only the second stage. he
destroys the old values, but the child is building new
ones. Every Law of the humans would be wrong for the
Übermensch, but human laws can help to create him.
^Preciseły. We are ƒorced to create these ławs büt müst
acknowłedge them as being the resüłt oƒ imperƒect
hümanity. I łike yoü.